Afrasianet - Dr. Saeed Al Shehabi - Policies of disinformation and distortion have been imposing themselves on international politics in order to pass controversial projects.
What more frequently use flashy terms in this field, such as "peace", which loses its usefulness when it is imposed by force in favor of the stronger party in the conflict, as well as the political projects that are put forward to make normalization a reality, involve Israel in regional security systems, and make it an active party in Middle East politics.
Perhaps the United States would have been able to pass this if it were not for the continuous crimes committed by the occupying forces against the people of the Middle East Gaza and the West Bank.
The occupation's policies often reveal their details to its leaders, including the continuous attempts to annex the two areas to the Israeli entity after they have been evacuated from the Palestinian population and displaced or urged to move to other countries by means of extensive material inducements.
So far, those U.S.-backed attempts have failed. But the Western coalition did not stop there, or give up its dream of expanding the occupation. Arab regimes are involved in these attempts to provide funding for projects aimed at encouraging Palestinians to leave their land for other areas.
It is clear that after 80 years of occupation, Israel's full ambitions have not been realized. Recently, the attention of the Western coalition led by the United States has focused on weakening the parties that resist this policy and using the most severe means of revenge against it.
Targeting Iran with mass destruction, violating international laws, and insisting on breaking the thorn in its leaders is only part of attempts to uproot the roots of Arab and Islamic rejection of the occupation.
Suffice it to mention the quantities of bombs and explosives used to kill resistance leaders such as Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah and the Iranian Supreme Leader, Sayyid Ali Khamenei.
Israeli sources revealed that the occupying forces used approximately 80 to 85 tons of bombs and explosives in the airstrike that targeted the headquarters of Hezbollah in the southern suburbs of Beirut and led to the assassination of Hassan Nasrallah.
In the case of Mr. Ali Khamenei, the air fighter jets dropped about 30 smart bombs. The weight of the individual bombs used to breach the fortified compound and the ground bunker ranged from 50 kilograms to 800 kilograms per bomb.
Despite these crimes, the United States has sought in recent years to impose normalization with Israel by introducing the phrase "Abrahamic religions" and the "Abraham Accords", where the name of the Father of the Prophets is used to promote Western policies in the region, especially those related to the occupation and attempts to impose it by soft means after the failure of the use of force for that purpose.
The politicians concerned with the Palestinian cause, especially the Westerners, are not concerned with religion, but are mostly motivated by political and expedient motives. Yet they do not hesitate to use religion to pass their policies with minimal rejection or resistance.
After decades of failure in attempts to normalize with the occupation entity, and five bloody wars in which the United States of America stood by Israel, and despite the use of excessive force in attempts to break the will of the Palestinian people and instill fear in the hearts of Arab governments to force them to go along with normalization policies, the psychological and political barriers with the occupation are still strong and high.
There is still a semi-cohesive Arab and international public opinion that rejects the occupation first, and does not accept attempts to pass it under the headings of "peace" and "reconciliation" or the establishment of a regional peace system.
However, successive US administrations continue to support the occupation entity, legitimize its existence, and impose political and economic normalization with it.
It is not new to say that American pressure has contributed to pushing some Gulf governments to negotiate with Tel Aviv and exchange ambassadors with it in some cases, but this pressure has failed to create Arab public opinion that acknowledges the occupation or seeks to coexist with it.
Artificial intelligence has become a candidate to manage economic, political, and technology issues in a world that has embarked on a new journey that may take it to a new virtual world.
To underscore the United States' determination to break the isolation of the occupation entity and try to integrate it into the region's political system, US President Donald Trump said on Friday that a civil nuclear energy agreement with Saudi Arabia is still conditional on the kingdom's accession to the Abraham Accords, and that the agreement does not include enrichment of nuclear material.
This is despite Saudi Arabia's position that it will not sign the Abraham Accords unless an agreement is reached on a roadmap for the establishment of a Palestinian state.
The deal allows Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium and reprocess nuclear waste, both potential pathways to producing a nuclear weapon. The UAE agreed to abandon these two things when it signed a similar agreement with the United States in 2009. U.S.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman signed the agreement, known as the Article 123 agreement, along with a bilateral safeguards agreement. Despite all the precautions taken by the American side to prevent the use of the Saudi nuclear reactor to produce nuclear weapons, Israeli voices have risen against it.
Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett, who is seeking to oust Netanyahu in the Oct. 27 election, said, "The nuclear deal being struck with Saudi Arabia, without Israel's knowledge, represents a serious strategic failure that endangers our security." "Enriching uranium on Saudi soil could lead to a nuclear race in the region and a serious loss of control," he said.
Former Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman said, "Saudi Arabia's civilian nuclear program will end with nuclear weapons and will lead to a crazy arms race across the Middle East." Oil countries are building nuclear reactors to provide domestic consumption of fossil fuels, increase oil exports, generate clean energy and meet the growing demand for energy.
In addition, countries' oil reserves are limited by long or shortened periods. As oil depletion mounts, these stockpiles are nearing completion. Prudence requires reducing oil extraction while seeking and investing in alternative sources of energy.
The nuclear alternative is one of the options available to countries with significant financial capabilities. But taking this route is fraught with risks, especially the environment.
As the planet warms, all governments are called upon to adopt development policies that do not threaten the environment. It is difficult to put forward the idea of abandoning the construction of nuclear reactors in light of Israel's expansion of their construction and use within its military system.
Perhaps it is logical for Arab governments, especially oil ones, to sharpen their ambitions and take a tough decision, even for once, to exert real pressure on the United States to reduce its support for the occupation entity, and in addition, to adopt a policy of subjecting Israeli nuclear facilities to international supervision, albeit belatedly.
At the same time, the Arab world should get out of its cocoon and contribute to technological development projects, especially after artificial intelligence has become a candidate for managing economic, political and technological issues in a world that has begun a new journey that may take it to a new virtual world where there is no place for humans, after artificial intelligence has taken its place and has become a tool of political domination in the foreseeable future.
There were those who thought that exerting pressure on the international community, especially the countries friendly to the Arabs, would lead to the crystallization of an effective international position that would contribute significantly to besieging the occupation and forcing it to observe some international laws and norms.
This path might have been appropriate if successive U.S. administrations had not made protecting Israel a top foreign policy priority. Therefore, the practical way is to seek to crystallize a common Arab-Islamic position that puts pressure on the United States politically and economically to force it to make a change in its policy that supports the occupation absolutely.
________________
