Afrasianet - The Gaza war proved that the Zionist entity cannot be a state in the legal sense, but rather a gang formation that has wrongfully stolen the property of others and violated all conventions and customs.

Reducing the causes of the Gaza war to the events of the seventh of October is a flattening reading, as the events of the Al-Aqsa flood are mainly the result of historical, political and economic accumulations, dating back to long years of Zionist violations and Palestinian human suffering.

However, the grip of anger on the day of the flood had several unprecedented achievements in the history of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, the first of which proved beyond any doubt the illusion of the idea of "regional partnership" with the Zionist entity, which the West sought to promote in the Arab and Islamic world, and proved during the recent Gaza war that it is an absurd chaotic entity that does not understand humanitarian principles and does not understand the rules of international law in wars, most notably the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949.

In other words, the events of the Gaza war proved that the Zionist entity cannot be a state in the legal sense, but rather a gang formation that has wrongfully stolen the property of others, violating all international conventions and norms. Accordingly, the call for a two-state solution has become completely fallen, as there is basically no other state in exchange for a Palestinian state with which to negotiate, and what is said about the two-state solution is nothing but latent mines.

As for the negotiations for the release of prisoners and detainees and the cessation of attacks, which are being arranged, they are between the Palestinian state on the one hand, and an international system that sponsors the criminal formation called Israel, on the other. This denial is not based on an ideological or nationalist position only, but also on political data, most notably the conviction of Israeli leaders that they are a gangster formation and not a state, and this is evident from their violation of all international laws and norms.

Hamas' continued control of the Gaza Strip is a clear and explicit victory over Israel, declaring the latter's failure to achieve the most basic declared goals of the war.

The Al-Aqsa flood also achieved an important victory in stripping the Zionists of their raison d'être in the region and overthrowing the theory of "sustainable security." In recent years, Israel, with the help of Western countries, has tried to convince the regional periphery that recognition of Israel is necessary to achieve lasting security and stability in the region.

But the repercussions of the Al-Aqsa flood revealed that the survival of the entity in the region is one of the most important reasons for its instability, and that it is a criminal fascist regime that cannot achieve stability if it is alive, and that there is no solution or security except by uprooting this usurping entity from the region, even if it is at the most expensive prices, and during a period the resistance demolished the expansion project at the head of the Zionists with great professionalism.

What the Zionists do not understand and will not understand is that the continuation and increase of violations do not deter the Palestinian people from resisting, but rather increase their resilience and generate more sophisticated methods of fighting. Rather, the division of Gaza, the military project Israel is now working on, could contribute to the emergence of a soft region where extremism is spreading, which will have catastrophic repercussions on the Zionist entity and neighboring countries.

This means that Hamas's continued control over the Gaza Strip is a clear and explicit victory over Israel, declaring the latter's failure to achieve the most basic declared goals of the war. On the other hand, ending Hamas's presence in Gaza would have serious repercussions; Hamas is not only a resistance movement, but also a political and social administration since 2006, with a broad social connection and extension with segments that will continue to express their anger in perhaps more violent ways.

In the same context, the brutal crimes do not convince the Arab world of the importance of peace, but rather incite the Arab peoples, and even the peoples of the world who are appalled by the barbarism of the Israeli behavior against it, which increases the pressure of the Arab and Islamic street on its governments against normalization, and supports the idea that Israel is nothing but a bastard entity that cannot be rehabilitated for safe living in the region, which keeps it under the obsession of continuous rejection and resistance.