Afrasianet - Zakaria Shaheen - Before the United States dragged the West behind it to invade Iraq, then US Secretary of State Colin Powell stood at the UN Security Council in 2003, when he was the US dean of diplomacy to deliver a speech with a test tube claiming that it contained samples proving that the Iraqi authorities possessed weapons of mass destruction, It turned out that this was a lie that was used as an excuse to invade Iraq, which led to the subsequent transfer.
The scene is repeated today, and through many Western diplomats, but this time against Sorba absolving the military threats provocative, under the pretext of the use of chemical weapons.
What is going on? Why now?
Of course, America stands at the head of those who are threatened, which has a precedent in this area, as the US envoy to the Security Council, Nikki Hailey, warns of the failure of the Security Council to move on Syria, stressing that her country will intervene in Syria in the event of inaction.
"The United States remains ready to act if necessary, as it did last year when it fired missiles at an air base of the Syrian government because of a chemical weapons attack that killed people," she said.
The US bombed a Syrian air base with dozens of missiles in response to the allegations of "chemical Idlib" on April 6, 2017, when US ships launched missiles "Tomahawk" on the base of barricades in central Syria.
Western leaders are joining the US position to launch less provocative positions without any proof of what they believe. But before that, Western media have hinted that the United States, France and Britain are discussing new attacks on Syria. This was confirmed by French President Emmanuel Macaron. "If we get compelling evidence that the chemical weapons banned under the treaties have been used, we will hit the places where they were taken," he told reporters. In the same vein, he spoke with British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
The media does not even speak of the chemical weapons workshops found by the Syrian army in more than one area that liberated them, the last of which was the finding of a workshop for gunmen in the eastern Ghouta used to produce chemical weapons.
The workshop was found in the village of Aftris, and what was found was part of what the gunmen were preparing to accuse the Syrian army of launching chemical attacks in the eastern Ghouta.
Who can judge using chemical weapons?
Although only experts can draw conclusions about the use of chemical weapons. They do not yet do so. The Western propaganda trumpets begin to charge accusations without any evidence. But what can be deduced is that the more the gangs "breathe out" in Ghouta, the more orders come from their operators to reuse false accusations against the army Syrian regime using chemical weapons against civilians.
America has not succeeded since it threw its weight and its agents in the region from the Syrian collapse, or what it says it wants to eliminate the Syrian president, although confirmed information that the US intelligence had prepared in early 2011, the White House, about 50 scenario to eliminate Syrian President. "Obama has not taken it upon himself to go in this direction, while the current US president is trying to revive these scenarios despite disagreements between his advisers and the military.
It has already confirmed that it has been tested by the OPCW tracking laboratories for more than once that there is no evidence of the Syrian army's use of chemical weapons. Therefore, it has circulated the accusations and distributed them to everyone.
The UN's permanent representative to the United Nations, Bashar al-Jaafari, revealed at the end of last month the Syrian government's information that the terrorists were preparing for a terrorist act in which chlorine was widely used to accuse the Syrian army. "These terrorists have strict instructions from Western and Turkish intelligence to fabricate Chemical attack before 13 March ", since the 87th session of the Executive Board of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons would be held on that date.
Syrian forces have been aware of this, as indicators of the military action Atlantic and not a single American indicators present, and may be based on the use of a chemical accident fabricated, for this reason may have searched the Syrian forces accurately trucks forty-five loaded with relief materials entered Al-Gouta, and excluded some materials such as some types Medicines or detergents.
The Security Council wants to implement the chemical weapons ban in the world but can not control the use of this weapon by armed terrorist organizations. Especially with misleading media campaigns targeting Syria.
The "chemical" pretext to block the political solution in Syria
Washington stands out clearly in the face of any solution that could lead to the end of the Syrian war only if this solution is detailed in terms of ambitions to dominate the region without the opposition of any state.
Says that Russia is hindering the verification of the use of chemical weapons in Syria, but Russia wants to end this controversy by determining the responsibility of the party using the weapon but through an independent body, and thus submitted a draft resolution to the UN Security Council to establish a new " The use of chemical weapons in Syria to replace the joint investigation mechanism of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and the United Nations "but the divergence of views, trends and objectives between the two countries led to the rejection of this draft ... Russia seeks that the new body must be professional and non-politicized and operate on the basis of Da data Gh impeccable and is collected in a transparent and trustworthy manner. "
That the former joint investigative mechanism failed to conduct objective investigations that have become a tool for political manipulation by some countries. Russia is concerned that terrorists possess chemical weapons manufacturing techniques and the phenomenon of chemical terrorism, which is not limited to Syrian territory only.
Washington, on the other hand, "showed its truth to the international community that it does not want any independent professional mechanism to investigate," since any commissions or mechanisms of inquiry alleged would not be legitimate unless approved by the Security Council.
"Syria confirms that these American statements, which the authors themselves say are not based on evidence that they are correct at the moment and the allegations that the Syrian state has used chlorine gas sometimes and sarin gas," the media quoted an official source as saying. At other times prove that it is nothing more than lies based on novels of the American administration named its partners on the ground. At the same time, Deputy Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, Russia has called on the member states of the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons not to submit to the dictates of those who want to remove the legitimate authorities in Syria.
Commenting on the Paris meeting on the so-called international partnership to combat the use of impunity for the use of chemical weapons, Ryabkov said, "We call on the CWC member states to demonstrate political will and wisdom. Ready to use such offensive methods to distort the image of the legitimate government in Syria with the aim of removing them from power later. " "Partnership" is a means of "loading" the participants political commitments and the level of promotion of anti-Syrian decisions in the UN Security Council and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
"Irrelevant charges against Syria and Russia are still being made against the background of the continuation in the Middle East, in collusion with the West, of the return of chemical terrorism and of the explicit provocation of the insurgents using toxic chemicals," Ryabkov said. The destruction of United States chemical weapons stockpiles ".
The main points of a "clear" episode in which Syrian MP Ammar al-Assad said that recent US allegations about Damascus developing new types of chemical weapons were a desperate attempt to undermine Syria's political success.
He explained during his dialogue in the program "clearly," broadcast via "Sputnik", that the American pretext that Washington waving from time to time, is the usual behavior in US policy, both in Syria during the past seven years, or in Iraq before, to hide behind The crushing failure of its forces in Syria.
Adding that "if there is a use of sarin or chlorine or any chemical weapons in Syria, it is" by US orders addressed to the elements, "urging" and sticking to the Syrian Arab Army, Mardafa, that the manufacture of gas sarin by terrorists using Western technology, In a bid to derail the success of the recent political process in Damascus. "Moscow's warning that there has been a preparation for a terrorist attack by militants on their use of chemical weapons has been going on for nearly two months," he said.
The New York-based Human Rights Watch said that the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons had previously sent a fact-finding mission to Syria, but "no one has claimed responsibility for using chemical weapons." The investigation did not include the chemical massacre in the eastern Ghouta and the town of Ma'amat al-Sham in 2013, The Security Council renewed the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry to continue its investigations into the remaining attacks.
The United Nations Security Council also adopted a resolution condemning the use of chlorine gas in Syria in the third month of last year, without charge to any party, and threatened to impose measures under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations in the event of failure to respect future UN resolutions, "Severe" measures may include sanctions, even the use of military force.
The Russian president, in an interview with US journalist Megin Kelly of NBC, that the Syrian government has destroyed its chemical arsenal, confirming Moscow's knowledge of the planning of militants to counteract chemical attacks by the army, similar to the provocations that occurred in the past, To be used later as an argument to unite international efforts in the fight against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
The president compared these accusations to US Secretary of State Colin Powell's speech at the UN Security Council in 2003, when the US dean of US diplomacy hinted at a test tube claiming that it contained samples proving that the Iraqi authorities possessed weapons of mass destruction, which later turned out to be a lie used as an excuse to invade Iraq.
So why all this noise?
Why accuse Syria and its allies of these accusations, knowing that Russia and the tongue of its president says
And calls for a thorough investigation into the subject to punish officials? Why should not the noise be raised when many civilian casualties are caused by the bombing of the Iraqi-led international coalition of the Syrian cities of Raqqa and Mosul under the framework of their liberation operations from the Da'ash organization? .
In fact, these moves come at a time when the Americans and their proxies in the region have realized that they have lost little influence on the ground as the Syrian army advances and disrupts the organizations that have long been a tool of Washington and its agents.
Not only is the political loss too much for the United States to bear, it angrily sees what happened in Astana and Sochi when it sees the possibility of a Russian-led diplomatic success to solve the Syrian war dilemma.
Conclusion Despite the fact that America is trying to stay within the Syrian dilemma of "passive survival" through some of its military presence or through the support of many armed organizations, it knows completely that there is no role in the future in Syria and perhaps in the region by the official Syrian action backed by allies The United States can not fight.