Afrasianet - Hassan Nafaa - The results of the round of armed conflict that erupted in the wake of the "Al-Aqsa Flood" do not justify making any concessions to the Zionist entity. 

The parties involved in the raging conflict in the Middle East are preparing to begin implementing the second phase of the "Trump Plan to End the War in the Gaza Strip." Although the entitlements related to the first phase have not been fully implemented, due to Israel's insistence on not fulfilling all its commitments, especially those related to the ceasefire and humanitarian aid, the motivations behind the move to the second phase have begun to overshadow Israel's open attempts to thwart the entire plan. 

President Trump recently made statements in which he confirmed that the transition to the second phase of his plan "will begin soon", which made Netanyahu feel that the margin of maneuver available to him to disavow the entitlements of the Trump plan began to narrow for him, and then he found himself forced to make similar statements confirming that the second phase of the Trump plan is "about to begin"!! 

President Trump had consulted with a number of Arab and Islamic countries before officially announcing his plan on 29/9/2025, and after announcing it, they welcomed it and confirmed their readiness to cooperate with the United States in its implementation, despite reservations about a number of its provisions. 

Now, as preparations begin to begin to embark on the implementation of the second phase, which includes the full withdrawal of Israeli forces, the disarmament of Palestinian factions, the commencement of the reconstruction process and the development of a road map leading to the establishment of an independent Palestinian State, these States are required to ask themselves a set of important questions and to seek honest and honest answers. 

Is it really ready to enter now as a participant in the implementation of this phase and the fulfilment of its entitlements, especially since it is now required more than others to contribute the bulk of the "Multinational Stabilization Force" to the financing of reconstruction, and does it have a unified strategy to deal with the complexities involved, and thus the mines that may be planted during this phase and the traps that may be set in them?

It is known that the Security Council had previously adopted the Trump plan under Resolution No. 2803 issued on 17/11/2025, but this did not change much of its nature as a purely American plan, which means that it did not turn under the Security Council resolution into a UN plan whose implementation is on the international organization, as the Security Council was in fact content with authorizing Trump to supervise the implementation of the plan himself, in his capacity as the head of the Peace Council, in whose hands all powers and powers are concentrated. 

This means that he will be in a position to control the composition of all its mechanisms and monitor its performance, he will be in charge of selecting and appointing the rest of the Peace Council, he will be responsible for forming and directing the Multinational Stabilization Force (after consulting with the countries to which they are willing to contribute), and for appointing the "Management Committee" on local governance and overseeing the delivery of services, which will be made up of technocrats who do not belong to any political factions or currents. 

Because the relationship between the United States and Israel is not similar to the usual normal relations between the countries of the world, not to mention the strength of the relationship between Trump and Netanyahu on a personal level, it is expected that Netanyahu will become an active partner in everything related to the management of the transitional phase in the Gaza Strip and that he will have the opportunity to exercise a kind of "veto" on any move that he is not satisfied with, a situation that the Arab and Islamic countries should be aware of and anticipate in advance of what may result of consequences and complications.

The second stage for Netanyahu is reduced to "disarming Hamas and clearing the Gaza Strip of terrorism." He has made public statements that he will personally accomplish this task by force of arms if it cannot be achieved voluntarily by peaceful means, or by force through the intervention of the multinational force, reflecting his insistence on adhering to a permanent ceasefire only if the plan is implemented in accordance with Israeli priorities, interests and objectives. 

Because this task must be completed before Israel's complete withdrawal, and even before the reconstruction process begins, it has only one meaning: from now on, it will seek to use Trump's plan to achieve what the occupation army has been unable to achieve in the genocidal war it has been waging on the Gaza Strip for more than two years, which the Arab and Muslim countries that have agreed to participate in the formation of the multinational force should insist on rejecting it forcefully and clearly. 

Therefore, it is expected that Trump will try, at some point, to conclude a deal under which both sides are willing to make mutual concessions, such as Arab and Muslim countries agreeing to expand the scope of the Abraham Accords and taking certain measures to help Israel ease the international isolation it currently suffers from, in exchange for Israel showing greater flexibility when dealing with issues related to the scheduling of withdrawals, reconstruction, or any other such issues, which is a trap that Arab and Muslim countries should avoid In its trap.

In my assessment, the results of the round of armed conflict that erupted in the aftermath of the Al-Aqsa Flood do not justify making any concessions to the Zionist entity.

The historical record of his negotiating positions concludes that the concessions of Arab and Muslim countries tempt him to ask for more. He is always motivated by the conviction that such a step does not reflect a desire to achieve peace or a desire to shed blood and protect resources, but rather stems from a deep sense of weakness, cowardice, and lack of self-confidence, which drives him to go too far. 

Because his view of Arabs and Muslims is always characterized by superiority and superiority, and is based on a racist feeling that leads him to believe that Arab and Islamic countries are "afraid and not afraid," and therefore the more pressure they are subjected to, the greater the concessions they make. It is enough to recall here how this arrogant entity mistook Sadat's visit to Jerusalem in 1977, and sought to exploit it to push Egypt towards a single peace treaty that would help sow the seeds of strife in the Arab soil, instead of treating it as a bold step that provides an opportunity that must be seized To achieve a comprehensive peace with the Arab world as a whole.

On the other hand, it can be said that the racist reading of the connotations of the "Al-Aqsa Flood" has once again pushed the entity to make fatal mistakes, but this time it has cost it a lot.

Instead of seeing this "flood" as a resounding cry launched by a people whose land has been occupied and has suffered so much of the brutal practices of a settler occupation that has lasted for almost a century, it insists on describing what happened as a terrorist operation similar to the attack launched by al-Qaeda on New York and Washington on September 11, 2001, in order to justify its brutal reaction to the Palestinian people, which took the form of a war of genocide, ethnic cleansing and starvation, revealing the racist and brutal nature inherent in this behavior. The structure of the Zionist project.

If the Zionist entity were able to disarm Hamas and destroy the military structure of the Palestinian resistance factions, it would not have hesitated to carry out this task at any moment of its choice over the course of two years of its revenge war on the Gaza Strip, and it would not have needed a "multinational stabilization force" included in Trump's plan to carry out this task on its behalf. 

Therefore, it is not logical at all for the entity to demand that Trump's plan achieve what its infernal war machine has been unable to achieve for two years, or for Trump to demand that Arab and Muslim countries expand the scope of normalization with an entity that has killed, wounded, and buried nearly a quarter of a million people, equivalent to about 10% of the total population of the Gaza Strip. 

The international community must never forget that it is responsible for punishing this criminal entity, and for arresting and prosecuting all those who have committed all these crimes. The transition to the implementation of the second phase of the Trump plan should not forget the crimes committed by the Zionist entity and should insist that it does not go unpunished.

It is not theoretically unlikely that the implementation of the second phase of the Trump plan will pave the way for a comprehensive peace in the region if it is implemented in a way that: 

1. A complete and permanent ceasefire.

2. Formation of multinational forces to supervise the withdrawal of Israeli forces from all territories of the Gaza Strip, b) Border control and ceasefire, and c) Train Palestinian forces that will be tasked with gradually achieving security in the Strip.

3. Forming a "technocratic government" that works efficiently to ensure that basic services reach all citizens.

4. Initiating a comprehensive reconstruction process under the supervision of the Peace Council.

5- Creating the atmosphere for the organization of free and fair elections in both the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, supervised by the United Nations and helping to rebuild the Palestinian National Authority on a sound legitimate and representative basis that enables it to lead an independent Palestinian state as soon as possible.

The Arab and Muslim countries that are preparing to participate in the implementation of the second phase of the Trump plan have an opportunity to stop the war and restore calm in the region, provided that they are aware of the fact that making free concessions to a party that seeks hegemony and does not believe in peaceful coexistence among peoples does not help peacemaking as much as it salivates the party that is accustomed to criminality and helps to open its appetite for aggression.