Afrasianet - Oraib al, Rantawi - "Deception" is the name of the game that Barak plays in Beirut, he is content with distributing sweet promises, and each team hears what he wants to hear, praises the answers of the three presidencies on the American paper, then loads it on it, and presents it instead.

From Gaza to Damascus, through Beirut and Tehran, Washington does not stop playing the "game of deception" that it mastered at employing with the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House, in particular... One of the requirements of this game is the adoption of a policy of "open ends" for the arc of crises that extends from the Caspian to the Eastern Mediterranean, while its most vulgar tools are "lying", "anesthesia" and "spreading illusions", saying the same thing and its opposite, throwing international law and the human rights system into the garbage cans, reneging on promises and repudiating agreements, and ignoring even the initiatives issued by them, which they have always boasted and boasted about, that they were the ones who initiated them and supported their conclusions.

In Gaza, both the Biden and Trump administrations have taken the worst forms of repudiation of the agreements concluded, which came on their own initiative, only to return each time, to adopt the Israeli vision and narrative, which has no concept of Gaza and post-war Palestine, we know what Washington does not want, but it has not yet said what it wants, it has not once uttered the phrase "the two-state solution" once – during the Trump era, and took a position on the New York conference that was sponsored and initiated by Saudi Arabia and France. It described it as "fruitless," and pressured several countries not to participate in its work, and accused every government that recognized or revealed its intention to recognize a Palestinian state. But on the other hand, she did not tell us what was on her mind about the fate of an entire people, whose right, like the rest of the peoples of the world, to exercise self-determination and build its own independent state, there is an incomplete state in the region, not a people that is redundant, according to the most fascist and extreme Zionist-religious theory.

In the truce and ceasefire negotiations, Washington was not for a moment, an honest and respected mediator, it was often the most extreme adversary of the Israeli enemy. The opponent and the referee, and its latest game, was to withdraw from the last rounds of negotiations, which has always been unique in spreading an atmosphere of détente and preaching the imminence of reaching a "solution"... Hamas was the burden of failure, even though the two Arab mediators had a different opinion, and the master of the White House came out with the baton of threats and threats, leaving Netanyahu to decide on the next step, before the administration returned to talking about major progress (Marco Rubio) and the return of negotiations to their tracks (Steve Witkoff), a deceptive coup in the scene, even before the ink of the decision to withdraw the American delegation from Doha dried.

The "open ends" of the crisis of aggression on Gaza tempt Israel to go beyond its dark dreams and expansionist ambitions, from occupying the entire Gaza Strip and extending sovereignty over it, if possible, to suffice with talking about annexing the security strip and areas deep in the north, opposite the major settlements in the Gaza Strip. Leaving the rope to Netanyahu and the neo-fascist clique is at the heart of the strategy for Gaza and the future of the Palestinian cause.

In Lebanon, the matter was not much different, it was the one who mediated to end the war, it was the one who chaired and sponsored the five-member monitoring committee to supervise the implementation, and today it is the one who threatens hell for Lebanon if it does not obey Israeli dictates. It is the one that rushes to disarm the resistance, even if it leads to the spread of destruction over the country, it refuses to provide any guarantees to Lebanon, and it disavows any demand to pressure Israel. Moreover, its envoy, Tom Barak, did not hesitate to destroy the dream of the Lebanese people for a "final homeland" and waved the card of annexing them to Syria under the administration of its new rule.

"Deception" is the name of the game that Barak is playing in Beirut, he is content with distributing sweet promises, and each side hears what it wants to hear, praises the answers of the three presidencies on the American paper, and then carries on them, and instead presents very narrow timetables for disarmament. 

The "open ends" of Lebanon's complex crises are the strategy adopted by the United States as well. In Palestine, there is no promise of a state for the Palestinians... In Lebanon, there is a threat to dissipate the state of the Lebanese... However, among the Lebanese, as well as among the Palestinians, we see those who are still clinging to the ropes of illusions, betting on "differences" and "differences" between Washington and Tel Aviv, and even proceeding with the Americans in playing the game of deception and pressure on partners at home, without realizing that he is the "white bull" that will be eaten if he eats the "black bull."

In Syria, the sudden American "transitions" from one extreme to the other have shocked even Washington's closest allies, who are most attached to its strategies. From caution and reticence at the beginning of change, to openness, praise, welcome, lifting of sanctions and betting on the new regime, before "Rima returns to her old habit", and "Caesar" is being waved again and the game of pressure and blackmail of the regime begins, to accelerate the process of adaptation to the requirements of Abrahamic normalization, and to surrender to "Israel" with its two occupations: old and new, of strategic and rich large parts of Syrian territory.

Talking about Syria's unity, sovereignty and territorial integrity was only one chapter of the "deception game" to numb the new regime, and its Arab and Turkish supporters in particular, as the "open ends" strategy is being implemented in Syria as well. Washington no longer objects to the adoption of a "minority federation", and it is pressing with Tel Aviv to separate the three southern governorates from the rest of the Syrian homeland, under deceptive security headings, and it is not at all excluded that it supports the emergence of minority entities in the Sahel and the northeast, as all it cares about in Syria is to preserve Israel's security, quench its expansionist appetite, and recruit the "beneficial" Syria, which extends from Aleppo to Damascus, passing through Hama and Homs, in the project of "repelling Iran" and preventing its expansion, and strangling Hezbollah and preventing its recovery.

There is no American vision of Syria after Assad, the file is open to various scenarios, waiting for the most suitable scenario to mature  for Israel's interests and superiority. Otherwise, there is no tax on the sweet words against the Sharia and its management, which is always of the kind that can be reversed to its opposite, and perhaps in the blink of an eye, managing the Syrian crisis, instead of resolving it, and keeping its ends open, are the headlines of the American strategy in Syria and towards it.

As for Iran, yesterday, it was the scene of the biggest "deception game" played by Washington, when it launched the first and largest air and missile strikes with Israel directed at this country, just 48 hours before the sixth round of nuclear negotiations in Muscat... Today, however, Washington is playing the same games and using the same tools, lying when its president talks about an Iranian "begging" to communicate with his administration, and lies when he denies his intentions to "regime change," and the only believable thing in his unbridled statements is his threat to re-target Iran's strategic facilities.

There is no definitive vision of Iran's future, only "open ends", which includes the resumption of war, support for separatist groups and the division of Iran, unless Tehran raises the white flag and joins its judiciary and the Abrahamic locomotive.

There are no American solutions, or even visions of solutions, to any of the crises of the Greater Region... Managing these crises, according to the "open ends" theory, is the American approach adopted until further notice, and it requires the repeated use of all the tools of lies and deception, and the excessive reliance on the "neighborhood of the enemy", and what the muscles of its army, which are being developed and amplified by American vitamins and nutritional supplements, can accomplish in the fields of and permissibility.