Half a million Palestinians did not gather at the Rafah crossing to escape to Sinai, gathering on the Netzarim corridor on the journey back to destroyed homes

Afrasianet - Oraib Rantawi - US President Donald Trump has been very serious about displacing Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Jordan and Egypt.A berserk sponsor messes with the porcelain shop. He seemed more confident and more certain that these two neighboring countries of Palestine, will accept his offer or will eventually submit to his pressure, and how to refuse, which have long been on the lists of US foreign aid, and it is time to "return the favor" and do what is necessary to help the president of the superpower achieve the goals and objectives of his project, which is derived from the dictionary of Zionism-religion, its vision and narrative.

Observers were eager to explain the secret of this excess enthusiasm that swept the president crowned with a concerted electoral victory, akin to a "tsunami", a group of them went on to say that the man is aware of what he says, and that he is completing what the Democratic Biden administration began timidly and hesitantly, and what he started is the time of the first "deal of the century" years ago, and that he, who belongs to a populist right woven from the fabric of the Israeli extreme right itself, finds no objection to marketing and justifying the "plan of decisiveness, annexation and displacement" that It began as a view of a marginal current in Israel before becoming a supreme strategy for the Jewish state.

A second group said that the man adopts another tactic by stirring fear and terror among his opponents and allies, alike, and that he is doing this to raise the price of his goods in the hope of obtaining other goods, elsewhere, but at a lower price. Here it is said that the displacement project will be abandoned, when the first steps of Israeli-Arab normalization begin, the focus of Trump's attention and focus, and instead of the "state" or the "irreversible path to the two-state solution" being the price of normalization, abandoning an artificial project becomes, Suddenly jumped to the surface, is the price required.

A third group went on to say that we are facing a test balloon, the bear of terror in the hearts of Palestinians, Jordanians and Egyptians was in it, otherwise the door will remain open to subsequent offers and deals, with more modest ceilings and prices, here attention turns to the West Bank, which the Israeli wants Trump to scoop of its land and holy sites, as a price for accepting a sustainable ceasefire in Gaza, or accepting conditional on the Gazans remaining on their national soil.

Whatever is going on in Trump's mind, and what he plans and seeks to implement, dropping this project seems to be a common interest for Palestine, Jordan, Egypt, and even the Arab world in general, and failure to confront it is not an option at all, especially since there are cards of power that if I am good at using them, or rather, if there is the will to use them, will be enough to bury him in the bud, despite the White House's cards of strength and pressure that he can use or wave. In this hurry, we can think At least five of them:

The first of these cards, and the most important of all, the Palestinians themselves rejected this project, in deeds and not only in words, and what happened during the "flood of return" to Gaza and the north, after the Israeli evacuation of part of the Netzarim corridor, was a spontaneous referendum on rejecting displacement. Half a million Palestinians did not gather at the Rafah crossing to escape towards Sinai, they gathered on the Netzarim corridor on the journey back to the destroyed houses, on foot, even if it required staying hours and nights on the "Calvary Road" due to Israeli procrastination. Fragrant with the scents of revenge and revenge.

All Palestinian forces rejected the project, not only the factions, but also the various activities of the Palestinian people everywhere. The "Achilles heel" The unified Palestinian position in the face of displacement is still represented in the PA's insistence on rejecting calls for reconciliation, arranging the Palestinian home and restoring unity, and its continuation of its miserable political bets, and its continuous quest to present "credentials" to Israel and those behind it, in the hope of obtaining a "place under the sun of the West Bank" in the first place, and in Gaza if it can reach it.

The second of these papers is the Jordanian and Egyptian positions, where Amman and Cairo feel threatened to their security and stability, and in the Jordanian case to identity and entity if this project is to see the light of day.. here we are not talking about a position of solidarity or support for the "Palestinian brothers", but rather about defensive and preventive policies, in defense of the credibility of governance and governments, in order to preserve security and stability, and in defense of identity and existence.

Here, it is expected that the positions of the two countries will be decisive in their clarity, and their red lines are visible as never before, as the price required of them to provide is not estimated in the money of American aid, but it can be said that the price resulting from angering Washington by refusing displacement will be much lower than the price required for its speeches and gaining its satisfaction.

The third of these papers is the positions of the member states of the "Arab Moderation Club", which began to appear at the last Cairo meeting, as the Palestinians this time, a cause, rights and resistance, are not the only ones who are threatened, but two basic and founding members of this club.

  Leaving these two states under pressure without an Arab safety net would endanger all their member states and threaten, without assurance whatsoever, that the weapon of blackmail will not haunt everyone if it succeeds in achieving its goals in the narrowest circle surrounding Palestine.

In this context, it is enough for the signatories of the peace treaties and the Abraham Accords to come together to come up with a unified voice: "All these agreements and treaties are on one side and displacement on the other," so that this project is dropped, and even the Arabs and Palestinians, from the birth of Trump and the post-war period, come out with a lot of hummus, not empty baskets.

Waving this paper is the most effective response to the man who aspires to win the "Nobel for Peace", even as he proposes a project for Gaza, which would turn him into The Hague on charges of calling for a war crime and forced displacement by all standards, a war crime with full descriptions and elements.

Each Arab moderation country has its network of relations with personalities, institutions and decision-making centers in the United States, and they collectively constitute a tremendous pressure force, if the effort is unified and the movement is coordinated.

Not all American institutions adopt Trump's policies and positions, some of which see him as "a raging elephant messing with the porcelain shop."

  This is the right time to mobilize the widest internal American front against this political lawlessness, which leads to the evasion of all values and principles of international law, and these countries must proceed from the assumption that Washington has interests in this region, and with these countries, no less important than the interests of our countries and countries with the superpower in the world.

Fifth, the European and UN positions expressed shock at the project, and their high-level circles spoke in a voice of rejection and disapproval, positions that are based on global concern about Trump's rise.  Neither the United Nations forgets for the man his quest to marginalize it and dry up its resources, nor Europe will forget his quest to dwarf it and undermine relations between the two shores of the Atlantic.  Here, we can search for a European and international safety net, fenced by international legitimacy, the decisions of international consensus, and the terms of reference of the peace process, to highlight the ugly faces full of racism of this project.

The chances of establishing a global, not Arab or regional front, to confront this project seem promising, if action is taken without delay, to save the rights of the Palestinians first, and to preserve the security of the Arab countries targeted by displacement second, this project is not an unwanted fate, and Trump is not omnipotent, no matter how much he reviewed and prolonged, and the United States before and after, a great player among other major players, and starting from confidence in the ability to defeat this project, is the condition for defeating it, and its defeat is possible and not impossible.