Afrasianet - Ahmed Bin Nasser - The success of the occupation some time ago in assassinating the martyr Yahya Sinwar "Abu Ibrahim" is undoubtedly a loss for the Palestinian cause in the short term, and may give rise to some uncertainty and uncertainty. however
• Isn't it wise not to look only at the present moment, but to see the event from a comprehensive perspective, combining the lessons of the past with foreseeing the future?
In this article highlights the lessons and lessons in looking at revolutions.
The assassination and capture of leaders does not eliminate the revolutions of liberation, but rather increases their strength and violence!. This is one of the most important lessons we have learned from the struggle and resistance movements against the occupation throughout history. Algeria is a good example of this; the revolution planned by a group of young people, led by six of them on the eve of the conqueror of November 1954, received very severe blows after only a few months, so Didouche Mourad was martyred, and Mustapha Ben Boulaid was captured before being martyred later, and this was the same fate for the martyr. Larbi Ben M'hidi, while Mohamed Boudiaf was captured. It was other crises that struck the leaders of the revolution.
• But the most important question here is: Did all these assassinations and arrests succeed in extinguishing the fire of the revolution?
After the Algerians saw the heroic sacrifices of the leaders of the National Liberation Front (FLN) and their confrontation with colonialism in the first ranks until they gave their lives for the homeland, the FLN rally increased, and faith in the revolution as the only way to achieve independence, so thousands of fighters joined its ranks, thus achieving the most dangerous nightmares of the occupation from where he does not know, and this is the pool of blood of the leaders that increases the ignition of the fires of the revolution to burn the occupier and his aides.
The revolution may sometimes fade, but soon it returns stronger and more violent, burning all those who stand in its way from the occupation and its aides. This fact is crystal clear in all revolutions, but every time the colonial powers make the same mistake
The occupation is stupid and does not understand despite the repetition, so how to think about eliminating the revolution of the Palestinian people by targeting its leaders, which has a long history of assassinating leaders, and this policy did not succeed in curbing the resistance, every departed leader succeeded by who is more miserable on the occupation than the previous one, to worsen his face what God wants to do; Her ideal face is an unplanned coming, and she will move to his brothers after him to continue the march. This is also the case with the rest of the resistance factions, from one leader to another until freedom is achieved.
In front of the rivers of blood shed by the occupation morning and evening, and its destruction of trees and stones in the Strip, the West Bank and Lebanon, some may think that this will succeed in breaking the resistance and its popular incubator, but the historical truth says that the policy of scorched earth and collective punishment will not push the people to disbelieve in the revolution, but will make them more believing in it as a means of liberation.
The revolution may sometimes fade, but soon it returns more powerful and violent, burning all those who stand in its way from the occupation and its aides.. This fact is crystal clear in all revolutions, but every time the colonial powers make the same mistake. The genocide of the indigenous population inspires hatred against the occupation, and encourages those who remained alive to join the ranks of the revolutionaries, to avenge the blood of children, women and the elderly who were assassinated by criminal forces.. Thus, the fire of the revolution remains burning until Victory.
My words may seem unrealistic to some, but what we have learned from the stories of our ancestors revolutionaries in Algeria confirms this, what the criminal Netanyahu is doing now, was preceded by another criminal, Charles de Gaulle, who lived the revolution in the harshest days of his rule, as he tried to isolate the revolution from the people through intimidation and criminality, imposing a siege applied to Algeria in the east and west, and intensified his attacks on the revolutionaries, and did not have mercy on anyone who felt sympathy for the Liberation Front.
But how did that end? After seven and a half years of patience and resistance, the Algerians forced Charles de Gaulle to sit at the negotiating table in which they gained their independence despite the nose of the occupier, despite the assassination of leaders and the submission of millions of martyrs.