Afrasianet - Muhammad Jaradat - The Israeli is accumulating its crimes in Lebanon as part of its military defense strategy to provide an opportunity for a diplomatic solution to stop the hand of Hezbollah, and the bombings of pagers are perhaps the latest of these pressures.
The conflict in northern Palestine intensifies with each new Israeli aggression against Lebanon and its resistance, and the subsequent creep of Hezbollah's belt of fire deep in the north, a march that gnaws the trunks of the Galilee Mountains towards "Haifa" and "Tel Aviv" little by little, and expands forward and does not recede in any way within a long-term strategy whose range shines since the eighth of October, and resonates after every Israeli security success with assassinations and bombings.
The crime of the Bager bombings against the youth of the resistance and their families comes as a new title in the context of the Israeli security success that is devoid of strategic impact, in light of the resistance's ability to contain the crime, and then expand the circle of attack fiery and geography, while choosing the time of the qualitative response within the requirements of the burning field on a daily basis throughout the north and its breadth, to intensify the internal Israeli question about the displaced residents of the north, after the introduction of new settlements and areas in the circle of daily bombardment, to make the options for their return appear narrow, which are basically limited options, What are the most prominent of these options?
The Israeli bet on the diplomatic option since the beginning of the Lebanese support for Gaza in the face of the war of extermination, in a strange keenness to limit the confrontation to Gaza, given the attack of the seventh of October, which has always vowed to return Lebanon to the Stone Age with the first missile launched from it against the entity, while the scene unfolds after nearly a year of non-comprehensive confrontation about an almost empty
north of settlers, and those who remain of them are risking their lives, and may violate instructions.
The Israeli was keen on the diplomatic option in the American and French way in the face of the deplorable developments in the north on the psychological level, as the Israeli for the first time is displaced inside the country, and whoever survives does not receive priority care from the "army" of the entity and its security and civil institutions, within an economic vacuum that burned the planting and offspring, despite the Israeli attempts to hide the entity's human losses, which are contradicted by the data of hospitals and medical centers in the north, which confirmed that they treated more than two thousand Israelis during the past months.
The failure of the diplomatic option between Israel and Lebanon, following the failure of the ceasefire negotiations in Gaza, with the resistance's initial insistence on linking its escalating daily attacks to stopping the war on Gaza, which prompted the Israeli to try to play on the chord of limited military escalation and qualitative security work, with the priority of the diplomatic option within Western and Arab endeavors, which appeared with the escalation of assassinations, culminating in the assassination of the leader Sayyid Mohsen, an assassination that, despite its cruelty, allowed Hezbollah's attacks to shift towards Nahariya Safed, Tiberias and Acre, to become a routine affair that does not break the barrier of transformation towards a comprehensive war, which emptied the assassination even of its field as well as strategic content, especially with the qualitative response to it near "Tel Aviv" against the headquarters of Unit 8200, which contributed to the consolidation of the reality of "Tel Aviv" as part of the Israeli bleeding arena, especially with the arrival of the Yemeni missile to its suburbs.
The failure of the option of parallelism between diplomacy and military and security escalation was an Israeli occasion to try to restore the prestige of deterrence that has collapsed since the seventh of October and dissipated in the sands of Gaza and the intractability of the northern West Bank and the strikes in Yemen and Iraq, and most importantly here the escalation of humiliation in the north, and the displaced people are screaming when they return, and they are doubting that the state is no longer anything but the state of Gush Dan; Tel Aviv and its surroundings.
The Israeli accumulates its crimes in Lebanon as part of the military defense strategy to provide an opportunity for a diplomatic solution to stop the hand of Hezbollah, and the explosions of the pager devices come perhaps as the last of these pressures, especially with the huge number of wounded that flooded Lebanese hospitals, and created a state of panic, given the nature of the bombings, with the injury of the Iranian ambassador in Beirut, even if it was a slight injury from the explosion of the device of one of his guards, did these explosions put the option of returning the settlers of the north to their homes at a crossroads?
The Israeli realizes that resolving his options towards war against Lebanon, with the blockage of the horizon in Gaza and the West Bank, is a heavy option that already makes him fight the war on 7 fronts, and the Lebanon front is the most dangerous, especially if the Syrian front is opened with it, but the Israeli entity is moving on the impact of the seventh of October captive to a deep wound with absolute arrogance, under an isolated leadership internally and externally, despite the flow of Western armament without limits, a reckless leadership despite its reluctance with Lebanon, although it tried to compensate for this hesitation with some Security successes, the latest of which are the Beger bombings, but all this does not restore the residents of the north, but rather
doubles the number of displaced people, exacerbates their crisis, and deepens the geography of displacement, which makes the option of war inevitable in light of the calcification of ceasefire negotiations in Gaza, so does this lead to Israeli displacement in Gaza with the lack of options with Lebanon to avoid the inevitability of the war option against it?
It is difficult to imagine seeing dramatic changes in the internal Israeli scene with the clock turning in different directions, unless Netanyahu's reported intention to dismiss Defense Minister Galant and appoint Gideon Sa'ar in his place is serious, which could create an opportunity for transformation, but not necessarily lead to Netanyahu's downfall, even if his position within the ruling Likud party is shaken, and Netanyahu insists on the Gaza war and the return of the residents of the north, and even considers the issue of the north as a priority of the war, which enhances the possibility of escalation. Between Lebanon and the entity and opens the door wide, with the key to the issue remaining in the Doha negotiations, so that there are those who scream first, and the resistance does not have such an option, which makes the whole issue dependent on the historical moment in which Netanyahu falls or recklessly towards a war that he cannot control its rhythm, which keeps the residents of the north, as well as the entire region, waiting for that moment