Afrassianet - Ibrahim Abrach - It is not true that the main reason for the Trump administration to postpone the deal is due only to the Israeli election crisis and the inability of Netanyahu to form a government, but the most important reason is the Palestinian official and popular rejection of the deal and the lack of response by the majority of the world.

The so-called Century Deal is not the consensus of all the pillars of the American administration and is more closely related to the controversial person of President Trump. So the American administration is well aware of the difficulty and impossibility of ending the conflict in the Middle East, especially the Palestinian one, without the consent of the Palestinians. .

There is no doubt that the Palestinian division, the state of weakness and Arab division, as well as the Israeli practices on the ground regarding Jerusalem and the settlements, all seem to suggest that they can be built on to settle the Palestinian issue and end the historical political and religious conflict in the Middle East. Has changed somewhat from the nature of the conflict and the dismantling and re-positioning of some of its parties, but it can not end the Palestinian cause or bypass the United Nations and its resolutions or end the state of religious hostility between Muslims and Arabs on the part of the Jews and Israel as a colonial project Zion On the other hand.

If the chance of success of the deal of the century in resolving the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is almost non-existent, what is Trump seeking to promote the deal of the century and the noise, and what is sought from behind the Bahrain workshop, and it is known that there is no conference or political meeting, Was under the direction and patronage of a major state with no declared or hidden objectives, regardless of the legitimacy or illegality of these objectives? .

In the world of politics and in the science of conflict management and international conflicts, we distinguish between ending conflict and resolving conflict. Washington, through its efforts, is aware that it will not lose anything from launching its project called the Deal of the Century. If its efforts succeed in resolving the conflict or dismantling it and changing its nature, And the measure of success and failure in both cases is not subject to the administration and the will of the US and Israel only, but the reactions of the Palestinians and Arabs and all those who oppose American policy, and continue to address it US policy.

 So, all that is going on are US attempts and bets to achieve all or some of the following goals:

1. Cut off any other party from proposing settlement projects or competing with Washington in its uniqueness in managing the conflict.

2 - Pull the rug from under the feet of the United Nations and its resolutions and organizations and the International Criminal Court, and the United Nations today is the place of the Palestinian leadership, and thus Washington seeks to cancel the international dimension of the Palestinian cause.

3. Gain time by trying to bring the Palestinians and Israelis back to a new round of futile negotiations, in order to enable Israel to complete its control plans and annex the entire West Bank and Jerusalem.

4 - Dismantling the Palestinian cause from its being a national liberation issue from colonialism and turning it into a humanitarian and economic issue. This brings us back to the pre-launch of the Palestinian revolution and the national liberation project of the mid-1960s.

5 - The blackmail of the PLO and its embarrassment, either attend the Bahrain conference, which means agreeing to the deal not only in its economic and even political, or continue in its rejectionist position, which may push other parties to replace them, and may be accused of not interested in improving the economic conditions of its people.

6 - To strike the unity of the PLO's representation of the Palestinians, through the opening of channels of communication and negotiations, one with the PLO and the other with Hamas, even the funds that are provided from Qatar and others and those promised by the Palestinians through the deal do not go to the address of one Palestinian, but divided between the authority Gaza and the West Bank.

7 - To strengthen the separation between what is supposed to be the promised Palestinian state lands by separating Gaza from the West Bank and creating internal strife.

8. End armed resistance by maintaining the last truce between the resistance factions in the Gaza Strip and Israel, which was sponsored by quasi-international and financial inducements, and Washington is not far from the subject directly or through its agents, not in vain also that the truce took place before the Manama workshop.

9 - Disengagement between Palestine and the Arab world through normalization and bypassing the Arab peace initiative. Participation in the Bahrain conference means abandoning this initiative.

10. Change the nature of the conflict by creating enemies for Arabs other than Israel. It is not in vain that the Manama conference be announced in light of the tension in the Gulf and the escalation of tension between Washington and Tehran.

This project, like its predecessors, will not achieve peace or end the conflict, even if some Arab countries agree with it, and we still hope that the Palestinian political forces will take up the matter and take a united position in the face of what is to come. We hope that the Arab regimes in the Manama workshop will not participate in the liquidation of the case through its financial role, because if the Arabs refuse to pay the necessary funds to finance the economic aspect of the deal, it will fail. Deal Or at least lose its Arab cover as it lacks its international and Palestinian cover, and Washington and Tel Aviv will remain alone in the face of the world.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.